On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 18:07 +0200, None wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:43:00PM +0400, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > >On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 01:01 +0400, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote: > > >>Hello All, > > >>I've just compiled -CURRENT (cvsup some hours ago) and the magdrm seemed > > >>to be fail. > > >>Last week's -CURRENT build was okay. > > > > > >Do you have device drm in your kernel? > > >Did you do a clean build? > > > > > > > Aha, I checked the config/NOTES and noticed that the new line: device drm > > Thank you :) > > > > >There's no real reason to be building the drm into the kernel that I can > > >see, as it's automatically loaded for you by the X Server. > > i might be off here, and dont intend to cause any offtopicness, altho i > was informed perhaphs wrongly, that kernel-builtin drivers are having > some speed improvements compared to loaded modules? I've never seen any measurements showing that that's the case, and would highly doubt there being any measurable effect. -- Eric Anholt eta_at_lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:19:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:32 UTC