> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:29:30PM -0700, /dev/null wrote: > >> needed. All in all life on 5.x and the "upgrade" wasn't too bad. I will >> say that there is ONE issue that I have found and have not yet solved. >> It >> now takes at least 2 times longer to build any of the ports. > > This is not a FreeBSD performance bug. FreeBSD 5.x uses gcc 3.x, > which takes longer to compile code than gcc 2.x because it does much > more optimization. > >> Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well. > > Since you were wrong about the above, WRONG?! ME?! That'll be the day. ;) Seriously tho, I am aware of the gcc versioning differences. But most of the "optimizations" can be performed by choice. That is to say I can negate the additional opts. And really, I didn't notice it in 5.0-RC2. It wasn't till 5.3-STABLE. > I have to ask whether you have > evidence of this. Indeed. Please see my comments on this in my reply to Jon. If that's not enough. Please give a hawler and I'll be happy to provide whatever you need. -Chris > > Kris //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////Received on Mon Apr 25 2005 - 09:08:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:32 UTC