On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:20:33AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:43:00PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:05:14AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > > Well, I'd caution against jumping into GCC 4.0 just because of the > > > claims of 25% speed improvement. That's about the single worst reason > > > to do it. But if you're interested in moving the technology forward, > > > I'd happily encourage you. The changed language constructs are the big > > > problem (extern struct foo bar[]; is no longer valid) since you not only > > > need to sweep the FreeBSD tree for them, you also need to sweep the > > > ports tree. I have mixed feeling on the value of GCC making sloppy > > > language extentions available for years and then suddenly revoking them, > > > and I know others that have been affected by 4.0 aren't terribly happy > > > either. > > > > Well. if we're going to import it, it should be tested on pointyhat > > first. IIRC Kris already run tests for some pre 4.0 versions. > > No, only for 3.4.4, which is going to be imported after I finish > testing the latest patchset from kan. Erm, is 3.4.4 already released, I couldn't find it on their page: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/releases.html -KirillReceived on Mon Apr 25 2005 - 16:53:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC