Re: ule+preempt?

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:51:44 -0700

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:15:56AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months.
> i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go
> to ule with preemption?

No, it can cause panics and is not yet reliable in my testing.

Kris

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Tue Apr 26 2005 - 16:51:47 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jose M Rodriguez: "Re: rigth crc32 implementation"
Previous message: Emanuel Strobl: "Re: groff alternative?"
In reply to: Randy Bush: "ule+preempt?"
Next in thread: Anish Mistry: "Re: ule+preempt?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC