Re: ule+preempt?

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:33:43 -0700
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:00:17PM -0400, Anish Mistry wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:40 pm, David Leimbach wrote:
> > On 4/26/05, Anish Mistry <mistry.7_at_osu.edu> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some
> > > > months. i am wondering if the waters have become relatively
> > > > safe to go to ule with preemption?
> > >
> > > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for
> > > now, but YMMV.
> >
> > Are you on an SMP box?  I have a feeling it's pretty good on a UP
> > machine
> >
> I'm on on UP.  Running on SMP will probably reveal the squishy 
> underbelly to which Kris was referring.

I'd expect the same problems to appear less frequently on UP, but with
a non-zero probability.

Kris

Received on Wed Apr 27 2005 - 00:33:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC