> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, /dev/null wrote: > >> Hello, >> As this is an RFC (I'm sure you already know that). >> >> Long answer: >> I'm not quite sure. It will depend on the amount and content >> of the comments. Technically, it may not start ever (because >> everyone/ or nearly everyone says it SUX). >> >> Short answer: >> Too early for me to say. > > I am not in favor of flashy boot screens and pretty ascii boot screens on > the simple basis that they violate POLA. They add complexity and no > functionality. I am of the opinion that the color beastie took things too > far already... ;-) You have a color one?! Where do you get it? I only have a white ASCII one. Seriously tho, in the event there is any doubt. I firmly believe that it should *always* be a matter of choice. One should always be able to enable/ disable, add or remove. So, should there be any doubt, I intend this - whatever it should become - to be something that can be added to (or removed from) whatever is current. nuf said. ;) -Chris > > My $0.10, > Andy > > PS: This email has been adjusted for inflation. > > | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////Received on Thu Apr 28 2005 - 21:06:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC