Re: wpa_supplicant causes panic in ieee80211_newstate

From: Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:09:01 -0700
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:20:40PM +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Brian Candler wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:05:44PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >>>Is there a canonical list of cards which *do* support WPA? I was guessing
> >>>(probably wrongly) that anything under the 80211 layer would.
> >>
> >>ath supports it.
> >
> >Thanks. Unfortunately, it seems that the list of supported cards in ath(4)
> >could do with updating.
> >
> >I just went out and bought a Netgear WG311 - that's exactly what it says on
> >the box. However it's not recognised by the generic kernel, nor by
> >`kldload ath`. According to `pciconf -l -v`, it is:
> >
> >none2_at_pci2:11:0:        class=0x028000 card=0x4c001385 chip=0x9066104c 
> >rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
> >   vendor   = 'Texas Instruments (TI)'
> >   device   = 'TNETW1130(ACX111) 802.11b/g Wireless Cardbus/PCI Adapter'
> >   class    = network
> >
> >Hmm, and now I know this, I find
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/033976.html
> >
> >Short of messing with Windoze NDIS drivers, it seems like I have bought
> >myself an expensive blanking plate :-(
> 
>   Looks like yet another revision trick performed by vendor:
> 
> 	http://hd.blogdns.org:3000/cgi-bin/wifi.cgi?Adaptors#311
> 	http://www.leenooks.com/112
> 
>   Perhaps we should document the extra "v1" in the man page?

Since we're not attempting to keep the list complete, I've removed in in
HEAD and will do so in stable.  The v1's are probably unobtainable at
this point anyway so it's just asking for confusion to leave it in.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

Received on Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:09:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC