> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:08:00PM -0700, /dev/null wrote: >> Hello, >> As this is an RFC (I'm sure you already know that). >> >> Long answer: >> I'm not quite sure. It will depend on the amount and content >> of the comments. Technically, it may not start ever (because >> everyone/ or nearly everyone says it SUX). >> >> Short answer: >> Too early for me to say. > > On this proposal, I think that some graphic banner while booting could > be beautiful to the eye, but quite void in usefullness. I'm not against > it, but can't see any real advantage. Anyway if someone feels like > spending some time on this feature and the results does not bring any > regression to the system I don't see why it should not be offered as an > option. > > On the other hand I think some tidying up in the rc sctripts boot > messages would really REALLY be a good idea. Indeed, this was brought up before and I would be *more* than happy to concentrate my efforts there first (instead?). Maybe I'll start a new RFC for it. Good idea? > I don't mean anything > drastic, just that in 5.x(as was altready pointed out) the output is a > bit messy, and even if I can sort it out uite clearly out of habit, it > would be better if it was a bit more structured and ordered. > > My 2 cents...nothing more, nothing less. > > -- > Guido Falsi <mad_at_madpilot.net> > -Chris //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////Received on Fri Apr 29 2005 - 20:57:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC