Re: pthreads: shouldn't nanosleep() be a cancellation point ?

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:57:54 +0200
In message <Pine.GSO.4.43.0508021021450.5408-100000_at_sea.ntplx.net>, Daniel Eisc
hen writes:

>Do you want to do the mods to libpthread and libthr (in
>libthr/thread/thr_syscalls.c) or do you want me to do them?

return (ENOTENOUGHCLUE);



-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tue Aug 02 2005 - 12:57:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:40 UTC