On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:42:36PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Consider /dev/mem (since that is a favourite in this thread). You are > unlikely to hit EOF but reading more than required is likely to cause > unwanted I/O errors or unexpected device behaviour by accidently reading > "magic" device addresses. > > That said, most other devices will either reject seeks (eg tapes) > or will correctly (if inefficiently) handle reading too much. And > anyone who uses stdio to read /dev/mem probably deserves the hole > in their foot. > > I can see two reasonable interpretations of stdio on devices: > 1) The process issues a setbuf(3) family call to define the buffer size > that it wants to use for physical reads/writes. The process then uses > stdio calls to read/write arbitrary sized data which is re-blocked by > stdio to suit the device. Yes. See my other answer in this thread. Buffering or no-buffering or sized-buffering is well controled via setvbuf and is a part of user interface. If user don't use specifical setvbuf on chardev, he probably assume that this particular chardev is bufffer-friendly. But there is no similar user-visible knob to turn on/off fseek's in-buffer seeking, so it is always off for chardev for more safety. > 2) stdio should be transparent - fread/fwrite/fseek are expected to > map directly onto read/write/lseek. It is never do that way per desing. > The current implementation falls somewhere in between: read and write > are buffered but seeks are transparent. This would seem to be the worst Seeks are just not controlled by user, so they are transparent for that reason, while read/write buffering is controlled. > In both cases above, seek really needs to be intelligent - more so > than for regular files. It needs to lseek() in multiples of the > device block size and then adjust the buffer offset to handle any > remainder. I don't understand this statement well enough. Currently fseek always sense in-buffer data for regular files for both SEEK_SET and SEEK_CUR. -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Thu Aug 04 2005 - 08:52:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:40 UTC