Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Hello, > > in 6.0-beta2 I'm missing at least three NO_... defines which are evaluated > but neither mentioned in the make.conf man page nor listed as examples in > shared/examples/etc/make.conf > Those are: > NO_HTML > NO_RESCUE > NO_FSCHG > > Shall I file a PR? Depends, where did you find these defines? There is a chance that the authors of those Makefiles did not intend them to be exposed to users, which is why they are not documented. A good place to get an idea of the author's intention is the CVS history of those files. hth, DougReceived on Tue Aug 09 2005 - 18:27:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC