On Tuesday 09 August 2005 02:46 pm, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 August 2005 07:40 am, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > HEAD as of yesterday + rwatson mega-commit from today. > > > > > > > > lock order reversal > > > > 1st 0xffffff0000ad6bf0 if_afdata (if_afdata) _at_ > > > > sys/netinet6/scope6.c:415 2nd 0xffffffff8081dd30 user map (user map) > > > > _at_ sys/vm/vm_map.c:2997 KDB: stack backtrace: > > > > > > > > --- trap 0xc, rip = 0xffffffff804990a0, rsp = 0xffffffff809dc3f0, rbp > > > > = 0xffffffff809dc430 --- in6_setscope() at in6_setscope+0x50 > > > > in6_ifdetach() at in6_ifdetach+0x24a > > > > if_detach() at if_detach+0x39 > > > > ether_ifdetach() at ether_ifdetach+0x35 > > > > sk_attach() at sk_attach+0x51a > > > > > > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > > > fault virtual address = 0x18 > > > > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > > > > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xffffffff804990a0 > > > > stack pointer = 0x10:0xffffffff809dc3f0 > > > > frame pointer = 0x10:0xffffffff809dc430 > > > > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > > > > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > > > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > > > > current process = 0 (swapper) > > > > [thread pid 0 tid 0 ] > > > > Stopped at in6_setscope+0x50: movq 0x18(%rax),%r13 > > > > > > > > (gdb) l *0xffffffff804990a0 > > > > 0xffffffff804990a0 is in in6_setscope (sys/netinet6/scope6.c:417). > > > > 412 u_int32_t zoneid = 0; > > > > 413 struct scope6_id *sid; > > > > 414 > > > > 415 IF_AFDATA_LOCK(ifp); > > > > 416 > > > > 417 sid = SID(ifp); > > > > 418 > > > > 419 #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC > > > > 420 if (sid == NULL) { /* should not happen */ > > > > 421 panic("in6_setscope: scope array is NULL"); > > > > > > Well, SID is a macro that expands this to: > > > > > > sid = ifp->if_afdata[AF_INET6]->scope6_id > > > > > > If if_afdata[AF_INET6] has already been freed that could be the > > > problem. It might have never been non-null either I guess. You can try > > > having in6_setscope() bail if ifp->if_afdata[AF_INET6] is NULL. > > > > I will. I think I found another problem with attach/detach in sk. > > The above seems to happen in the "No PHY found" case (which I fixed > > already locally and everything went away). > > Leaving it to hit the problem it goes like this: > > ... > skc0: no PHY found! > panic: ifp->if_afdata[AF_INET6] NULL > KDB: enter: panic > [thread pid 0 tid 0 ] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x2f: nop > db> where > Tracing pid 0 tid 0 td 0xffffffff8081e6c0 > kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x2f > panic() at panic+0x1d2 > in6_setscope() at in6_setscope+0x20f > in6_ifdetach() at in6_ifdetach+0x24a > if_detach() at if_detach+0x39 > ether_ifdetach() at ether_ifdetach+0x35 > sk_attach() at sk_attach+0x522 > device_attach() at device_attach+0x292 > bus_generic_attach() at bus_generic_attach+0x18 > skc_attach() at skc_attach+0x6df > device_attach() at device_attach+0x292 > ... > > bz_at_amd64:/local/building/freebsd/HEAD/sys> cvs -qR diff -up > netinet6/scope6.c Index: netinet6/scope6.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /local/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/netinet6/scope6.c,v > retrieving revision 1.15 > diff -u -p -r1.15 scope6.c > --- netinet6/scope6.c 25 Jul 2005 17:28:39 -0000 1.15 > +++ netinet6/scope6.c 9 Aug 2005 17:35:07 -0000 > _at__at_ -412,8 +412,13 _at__at_ in6_setscope(in6, ifp, ret_id) > u_int32_t zoneid = 0; > struct scope6_id *sid; > > + KASSERT(ifp != NULL, ("ifp NULL")); > + > IF_AFDATA_LOCK(ifp); > > + KASSERT(ifp->if_afdata[AF_INET6] != NULL, > + ("ifp->if_afdata[AF_INET6] NULL")); > + > sid = SID(ifp); > > #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC > > Could it be a problem of ether_ifattach and ether_ifdetach being > run without the driver locks? UP machine btw. I don't think it is a locking problem. I think that the inet6 code is simply not taking into account some edge case. In theory I don't think that if_afdata[AF_INET6] should be NULL since ether_ifattach() has called inet6's domain attach routine. Are you sure that you have called ether_ifattach() btw? -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Tue Aug 09 2005 - 19:35:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC