Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2005 00:00 CEST schrieb Emanuel Strobl: > Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 23:47 CEST schrieb Jeremie Le Hen: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > > > > And you don't suffer from a big disk performance degradation with > > > that? If you don't have I/O load it doesn't matter but I need usual > > > I/O performance so I give each jail its own partition (GPT > > > partitions). But I think some good guys are looking for fixing the > > > performance issue like they already solved the nullfs problem :) > > > Thanks again for that! (Jeff?) > > > > Are you sure that nullfs has been fixed ? In this case, the warning > > at the end of mount_nullfs(8) manpage should be removed. > > I haven't done my own benchmarks yet, but I'm quiet sure that was fixed > about two or three months ago in 6.0-current. At that time I was > figuring out how to avoid nullfs, but decided to keep using it, so I was > conviced that it's been solved ;) Here's what google found: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-April/048235.html -Harry > But I think Jeff can tell you more, if I don't mix up names again.... > > -Harry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC