Re: VIA/ACE PadLock integration with crypto(9).

From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:59:56 +0200
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:23:51PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
+> Overnight I also let a copy of netperf run blasting various network tests across the IPSEC tunnel and all was as expected.  I had to enable polling on the box as it was 
+> getting dangerously close to livelock with the high level of interrupts.  At 1500 HZ its still quite fast, forwarding IPSEC traffic at 60Mb/s and the box is VERY 
+> responsive.  Without the padlock.ko, it comes in just at 23Mb/s.

Good news, but I think, I expected more...

+> +> Also,   I came across a small ipsec bug while testing
+> >+>
+> >+> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84860
+> >It could be RELENG_5 specific, as it uses rijndael implementation
+> >which was removed after RELENG_5 (there is no sys/opencrypto/rijndael.c
+> >anymore). Maybe rijndael version from sys/crypto/ handles it better?
+> >This needs to be verified.
+> 
+> Actually this happens in RELENG_6 as well.  I have updated the PR with a crash dump and back trace.

Ok, I committed a fix to HEAD.
Here is the patch:

	http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/rijndael.patch

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd_at_FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

Received on Tue Aug 16 2005 - 17:00:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC