> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:34:39 +0200 > From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan_at_fafoe.narf.at> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:39:54PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:08:03 -0600 > > > From: Phil Oleson <oz_at_nixil.net> > > > > > > Do you have rev 1.10 of histedit.h? Update this file in src/include as well. > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > This is clearly the file I was looking for, but I have: > > /usr/include/histedit.h > > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/histedit.h > > /usr/src/bin/sh/myhistedit.h > > /usr/src/include/histedit.h > > > > All except /usr/include/histedit.h are 1.10. The make buildworld SHOULD > > be using the one in /usr/src/include, as far as I know. Looks to me like > > it's failing to find it and using the one in /usr/include instead. Or is > > my limited understanding of the build process in error? > > > > And I can't explain where the one in /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include > > comes from. > > Strange. Did you test if it works without ccache? As I understand it > the headers from src/include are temporarily installed to > /usr/obj/[...]/tmp and then used by GCC to build the world. Yes, I tried both with and without ccache. No difference. histedit.h has been at 1.9 for over two years and the Makefiles and .mk files have had a LOT of tweaking since then. This system is a new install that started with -current on about August 1. It should be pretty clean. Of course, I could just copy 1.10 into /usr/include/sys, but I really want to figure out why this is happening. I see myself spending too much time in a maze of twisty .mk files, all different. :-) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman_at_es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634Received on Thu Aug 18 2005 - 14:50:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:41 UTC