I found out that if I do this: ifconfig vr0 down reboot than it is okay and this sleeping locks does not cause kernel panic, which normally happens when I do not do "ifconfig vr0 down" command. I mean it does not appear in /var/log/messages too. Dan -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Dvořák Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:51 PM To: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org Subject: RE: LOR's wi ad0 and so on Hi, thank you for recommendation and finaly I have compared my LOR´s with your list of reported LOR´s. I will send one strange in this e-mail, which may be it is not LOR, but it has same format like LOR and this is the most serious, because twice time when it was logged in messages, always it was accompanied with kernel panic after boot or shutdown -r now commands. The others LOR´s I will send in another e-mail. Dan Sleeping on "itrmh" with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex vr0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc15d8938) locked _at_ /usr/src/sys/pci/if_vr.c:806 KDB: stack backtrace: kdb_backtrace(c08cbbf4,d1432a28,1,c1615600,c198c624) at kdb_backtrace+0x2e witness_warn(5,c155dc80,c07d9494,c07d6679,80246) at witness_warn+0x1d3 msleep(c1615600,c155dc80,a0,c07d6679,0) at msleep+0x62 ithread_remove_handler(c1615600,d1432a90,c0787071,c1615600,d1432ab8) at ithread_remove_handler+0x155 intr_remove_handler(c1615600,d1432ab8,c05896d5,c155d100,c15e2d80) at intr_remove_handler+0x11 nexus_teardown_intr(c155d100,c15e2d80,c1615b80,c1615600,c15e2d80) at nexus_teardown_intr+0x11 bus_generic_teardown_intr(c15e2380,c15e2d80,c1615b80,c1615600,c15e2d80) at bus_generic_teardown_intr+0x75 bus_generic_teardown_intr(c15e1e80,c15e2d80,c1615b80,c1615600,c15e2d80) at bus_generic_teardown_intr+0x75 bus_generic_teardown_intr(c15e2780,c15e2d80,c1615b80,c1615600,c15e2d80) at bus_generic_teardown_intr+0x75 bus_teardown_intr(c15e2d80,c1615b80,c1615600,326,c1620800) at bus_teardown_intr+0x72 vr_detach(c15e2d80,d1432b7c,c05889bf,c15e2d80,c1581028) at vr_detach+0x114 vr_shutdown(c15e2d80,c1581028,c0824378) at vr_shutdown+0x11 device_shutdown(c15e2d80,c15e2780,d1432ba4,c05889bf,c15e2780) at device_shutdown+0x4f bus_generic_shutdown(c15e2780,c15bb028,c0824378) at bus_generic_shutdown+0x28 device_shutdown(c15e2780,c15e1e80,d1432bcc,c05889bf,c15e1e80) at device_shutdown+0x4f bus_generic_shutdown(c15e1e80,c15ba028,c0824378) at bus_generic_shutdown+0x28 device_shutdown(c15e1e80,c15e2380,d1432bf4,c09e79d5,c15e2380) at device_shutdown+0x4f bus_generic_shutdown(c15e2380,1,c0a02e3d,2a2,d1432c0c) at bus_generic_shutdown+0x28 acpi_shutdown(c15e2380,c15bf828,c0824378) at acpi_shutdown+0x35 device_shutdown(c15e2380,c155d100,d1432c34,c05889bf,c155d100) at device_shutdown+0x4f bus_generic_shutdown(c155d100,c15a4828,c0824378) at bus_generic_shutdown+0x28 device_shutdown(c155d100,c155d580,d1432c5c,c05889bf,c155d580) at device_shutdown+0x4f bus_generic_shutdown(c155d580,c157b028,c0824378) at bus_generic_shutdown+0x28 device_shutdown(c155d580,c1520000,c152000c,d1432c88,c05634c5) at device_shutdown+0x4f root_bus_module_handler(c1528200,2,0,c1503aa0,d1432cbc) at root_bus_module_handler+0xcf module_shutdown(0,0,c07d8cd9,190,0) at module_shutdown+0x55 boot(0,0,c07d8cd9,a1,d1432d30) at boot+0x690 reboot(c198e300,d1432d04,4,421,1) at reboot+0x46 syscall(3b,3b,3b,0,4e) at syscall+0x2c0 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (55, FreeBSD ELF32, reboot), eip = 0x280ac07b, esp = 0xbfbfec2c, ebp = 0xbfbfec78 --- panic: sleeping thread (tid 100097) owns a non-sleepable lock cpuid = 0 KDB: enter: panic -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern A. Zeeb Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:01 AM To: dandee_at_volny.cz Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR's wi ad0 and so on On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, [iso-8859-2] Daniel Dvo?ák wrote: Hi, > I returned from my holidays and watch log. Many lock order reversal is > present in my system with beta 1. > > Maybe I am barking up the wrong tree. If so I am sorry for spamming. > > But I think that somebody maybe want to see it, so I am sending this: > > roztyly# uname -a > > FreeBSD roztyly.jspoj.czf 6.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 #0: Sun Jul 17 > 22:10:34 CEST 2005 stayd_at_roztyly.jspoj.czf:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROZTYLY > i386 [lots of almost unreadable logfile lines] > There are many more lor´s, but they repeat in same way like that. The logfiles pasted in are almost unreadable because of duplicate line breaks etc. Could you please check with http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html and only report those LORs that are not listed there. If mailing please check that your MUA doesn't do duplicate line breaks and line wraps for the LOR parts... You may also leave out syslog prefixes (timestamp, hostname, ..) if possible. Thanks. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT _______________________________________________ freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern A. Zeeb Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:01 AM To: dandee_at_volny.cz Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR's wi ad0 and so on On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, [iso-8859-2] Daniel Dvo?ák wrote: Hi, > I returned from my holidays and watch log. Many lock order reversal is > present in my system with beta 1. > > Maybe I am barking up the wrong tree. If so I am sorry for spamming. > > But I think that somebody maybe want to see it, so I am sending this: > > roztyly# uname -a > > FreeBSD roztyly.jspoj.czf 6.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 #0: Sun Jul 17 > 22:10:34 CEST 2005 stayd_at_roztyly.jspoj.czf:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROZTYLY > i386 [lots of almost unreadable logfile lines] > There are many more lor´s, but they repeat in same way like that. The logfiles pasted in are almost unreadable because of duplicate line breaks etc. Could you please check with http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html and only report those LORs that are not listed there. If mailing please check that your MUA doesn't do duplicate line breaks and line wraps for the LOR parts... You may also leave out syslog prefixes (timestamp, hostname, ..) if possible. Thanks. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT _______________________________________________ freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Wed Aug 24 2005 - 17:25:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:42 UTC