Re: LOR route vr0

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:46:31 -0600 (MDT)
In message: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0508270912550.969_at_e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
            "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net> writes:
: > lock order reversal
: >  1st 0xc17621ec rtentry (rtentry) _at_ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:1269
: >  2nd 0xc15ec938 vr0 (network driver) _at_ /usr/src/sys/pci/if_vr.c:1391
: 
: added with ID 140: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#140

I've noticed a *HUGE* number of LORs that look like this:

ock order reversal
 1st 0xc17490e4 rtentry (rtentry) _at_ sys/netinet/if_ether.c:445
 2nd 0xc15c94b0 rl1 (network driver) _at_ sys/pci/if_rl.c:1451
KDB: stack backtrace:
kdb_backtrace(c07dcab1,c15c94b0,c160a1b0,c07c54d7,c07f401e) at kdb_backtrace+0x2e
witness_checkorder(c15c94b0,9,c07f401e,5ab,c07e32bd) at witness_checkorder+0x6c3
_mtx_lock_flags(c15c94b0,0,c07f401e,5ab,c152cc00) at _mtx_lock_flags+0x8a
rl_start(c152cc00,1,c07e2eae,836) at rl_start+0x37
if_start(c152cc00,0,c07e32bd,195,202) at if_start+0x99
ether_output_frame(c152cc00,c169c100,6,c0562c28,c169c100)
	 at ether_output_frame+0x218
ether_output(c152cc00,c169c100,cbfe79f0,0,2,c1740001,2302,c07e66e8,1bd,519)
	at ether_output+0x47e
arprequest(c152cc00,c16cfcc8,cbfe7ae4,c15fa6ab,c05998a6) at arprequest+0x109
arpresolve(c152cc00,c1749084,c169a400,cbfe7ae0,cbfe7a64) at arpresolve+0x32d
ether_output(c152cc00,c169a400,cbfe7ae0,c1749084,0) at ether_output+0x7b
ip_output(c169a400,0,cbfe7adc,0,0) at ip_output+0xb7a

and am seeing the following in my newly locked ed driver:

lock order reversal
 1st 0xc1cb3588 rtentry (rtentry) _at_ net/route.c:1269
 2nd 0xc1fd3420 ed1 (network driver) _at_ /dell/imp/p4/newcard/src/sys/modules/ed/../../dev/ed/if_ed.c:697
KDB: stack backtrace:
kdb_backtrace(0,ffffffff,c0680950,c067f5a0,c064bd44) at kdb_backtrace+0x29
witness_checkorder(c1fd3420,9,c201ff8b,2b9) at witness_checkorder+0x52c
_mtx_lock_flags(c1fd3420,0,c201ff8b,2b9,c1a86c00) at _mtx_lock_flags+0x5b
ed_start(c1a86c00) at ed_start+0x1f
if_start(c1a86c00) at if_start+0x7b
ether_output_frame(c1a86c00,c1bbeb00,c04c0920,ffffffff,0) at ether_output_frame+0x1dc
ether_output(c1a86c00,c1bbeb00,e5832a38,0,2) at ether_output+0x3e4
arprequest(c1a86c00,c1d77ac8,e5832b08,c20236ab) at arprequest+0xd8
arpresolve(c1a86c00,c1cb3528,c1bbed00,e5832b04,e5832aa8) at arpresolve+0x30b
ether_output(c1a86c00,c1bbed00,e5832b04,c1cb3528,c1d77a00) at ether_output+0x6b
ip_output(c1bbed00,0,e5832b00,0,0) at ip_output+0x78c
udp_output(c1cb1168,c1bbed00,0,0,c1a8d600) at udp_output+0x4a7
udp_send(c1d59c84,0,c1bbed00,0,0) at udp_send+0x1a
sosend(c1d59c84,0,e5832c3c,c1bbed00,0) at sosend+0x5e3
kern_sendit(c1a8d600,4,e5832cbc,0,0) at kern_sendit+0x104
sendit(c1a8d600,4,e5832cbc,0,807a023) at sendit+0x163
sendto(c1a8d600,e5832d04,6,0,206) at sendto+0x4d
syscall(3b,3b,3b,805a000,28219fa4) at syscall+0x22f

and was wondering if there's a common cause.

Warner
Received on Sat Aug 27 2005 - 14:46:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:42 UTC