Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Fredrik Lindberg <fli+freebsd-current_at_shapeshifter.se> writes: > >>Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> >>>There is no reason to use threads in powerd. Simply merge the >>>devd_read() loop into your main loop, using select() with a timeout >>>instead of usleep(). >> >>Wouldn't that turn in into a polling style again? > > > No. > > >>The reason to use >>devd was to obtain a more interrupt driven model instead of the >>sysctl-polling method originally used. Both metods are supported and >>the devd method is only used if the devd.pipe is avaiable. > > > If the devd loop is an *alternative* to the polling loop, there's even > less reason to use threads. > > DES Yes it's an alternative, reading a variable versus doing a sysctl call each interation. It seemed like I good idea, when I first wrote this (almost a year ago), to have a thread providing a cached value of the AC state. But maybe I was trying to be too smart or something. Anyone know what happened to the powerd SoC project? I never spent more time on powerd because I assumed it would be more or less rewritten. I wouldn't mind hacking on powerd but I don't want to step on somebodys toes or duplicate work. Fredrik LindbergReceived on Tue Dec 06 2005 - 09:41:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC