Re: New libc malloc patch

From: Doug Rabson <dfr_at_nlsystems.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:17:09 +0000
On Monday 12 December 2005 03:16, Johan Bucht wrote:
> Isn't 8 byte alignment expected by some applications?
> How do you know if a allocation is huge if you don't have a tag?
> Something more to read up on i guess. =)

Actually, I'm glad you pointed that out. My own applications use SSE2 
primitives a lot and those guys need to be allocated on 16-byte 
boundaries. I currently use phkmalloc which has the nice property that 
small allocations are aligned to the next greater power-of-2 boundary 
which is (for me) always at least 16.

Since you are targetting modern architectures with this allocator, could 
you please set the minimum alignment on all i386 and amd64 processors 
to 16. For what its worth, when gcc is using SSE instructions, it 
assumes this for all memory, stack or malloc.
Received on Mon Dec 12 2005 - 09:17:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC