Hi, Scott Long wrote: > Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> I think FreeBSD Update shows the way forward but IMHO there needs to >> be an "official" binary update tool accessible from www.freebsd.org. >> > > FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the > actual FreeBSD Security Officer. It's as official as it gets. If > the only barrier to acceptance is that it's not distributed from the > FreeBSD.org domain, then a) that's a silly argument, and b) it's easily > solvable so long as Colin agrees. > isn't this the problem Microsoft faces all the while when users download the latest security patch from somewhere in the Internet? Teaching water and drinking wine? ErichReceived on Sun Dec 18 2005 - 02:07:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC