Re: XFS (read-only) support committed to CURRENT

From: Cai, Quanqing <caiquanqing_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:55:43 -0800
On 12/17/05, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> > Your comment makes no sense.  What does being GPL have to do with
> > choosing ext2fs vs. XFS?  We ported XFS to FreeBSD because we felt like it,
> > and it was fun. [...]
>
> That's a compelling reason. Seriously.

No offense, you could port ext3 too if you like...

My company has 20s nfs servers(6 250G RAID 1 units), currently use
SuSE9 w/XFS. I used ext3 on some but got long time fsck headache(Yes,
I have data=journal in fstab, but journal will fail under heavy load).
So personally I prefer XFS.

BTW, thank Craig Rodrigues, Alexander Kabaev, Russell Cattelan and all
others for porting XFS to FreeBSD, it's a good news for community. We
need a journal FS on FreeBSD so badly!

Cai, Quanqing
Received on Sun Dec 18 2005 - 06:55:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC