Re: DRM update for testing

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:24:16 -0500
On Monday 19 December 2005 06:13 pm, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On December 19, 2005 01:17 pm, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Freddie Cash <fcash_at_ocis.net> wrote:
> >  > Running glxgears at 1024x768x16 gives me a decent 35 fps, compared
> >  > to the 1 fps I used to get.  :)
> >
> > Uhm.  Are you sure that you're running hardware-accelerated
> > OpenGL glxgears?
> >
> > I get 48 fps at 1400x1050x32 -- in software, without any
> > hardware 3D acceleration.  (It's a 1.6GHz Centrino notebook
> > with shared i915 graphics.  2D acceleration is enabled, of
> > course.)
>
> Yep.  It's a bog-slow laptop (2.8 GHz Celeron CPU, 1 GB RAM, 40 GB HD
> running at ATA33 instead of ATA100, Radeon 7000 GPU).  It may be a 2.8
> GHz CPU, but it runs like a a 1 GHz, even in Debian Linux.
>
> Without DRM/DRI enabled in X, glxgears give single-digit framerates.  With
> DRM/DRI enabled in X, glxgears gives double-digit to triple-digit
> framerates (depending on window size).  The glxgears info also shows the
> hardware accel enabled and disabled correctly.
>
> Running Debian Linux unstable on the same laptop showed slightly better
> framerates in glxgears (~50 fps fullscreen vs. ~30 in FreeBSD), but the
> harddrive was also running at ATA100 (not that that should affect
> glxgears all that much).

These numbers all sound weird to me.  I get 300 fps on an ancient Matrox G200 
on a system with a 700Mhz Athlon.  At work we typically get around 1600 fps 
in glxgears with Radeon 8500's on systems with 865 chipsets and 2.4 - 2.8 ghz 
P4s.  Sub-100 fps for glxgears seems slow even for software rendering.

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org
Received on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 03:26:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC