On Monday 19 December 2005 06:13 pm, Freddie Cash wrote: > On December 19, 2005 01:17 pm, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Freddie Cash <fcash_at_ocis.net> wrote: > > > Running glxgears at 1024x768x16 gives me a decent 35 fps, compared > > > to the 1 fps I used to get. :) > > > > Uhm. Are you sure that you're running hardware-accelerated > > OpenGL glxgears? > > > > I get 48 fps at 1400x1050x32 -- in software, without any > > hardware 3D acceleration. (It's a 1.6GHz Centrino notebook > > with shared i915 graphics. 2D acceleration is enabled, of > > course.) > > Yep. It's a bog-slow laptop (2.8 GHz Celeron CPU, 1 GB RAM, 40 GB HD > running at ATA33 instead of ATA100, Radeon 7000 GPU). It may be a 2.8 > GHz CPU, but it runs like a a 1 GHz, even in Debian Linux. > > Without DRM/DRI enabled in X, glxgears give single-digit framerates. With > DRM/DRI enabled in X, glxgears gives double-digit to triple-digit > framerates (depending on window size). The glxgears info also shows the > hardware accel enabled and disabled correctly. > > Running Debian Linux unstable on the same laptop showed slightly better > framerates in glxgears (~50 fps fullscreen vs. ~30 in FreeBSD), but the > harddrive was also running at ATA100 (not that that should affect > glxgears all that much). These numbers all sound weird to me. I get 300 fps on an ancient Matrox G200 on a system with a 700Mhz Athlon. At work we typically get around 1600 fps in glxgears with Radeon 8500's on systems with 865 chipsets and 2.4 - 2.8 ghz P4s. Sub-100 fps for glxgears seems slow even for software rendering. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 03:26:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC