Eric Anholt <eta_at_lclark.edu> wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Freddie Cash <fcash_at_ocis.net> wrote: > > > Running glxgears at 1024x768x16 gives me a decent 35 fps, compared > > > to the 1 fps I used to get. :) > > > > Uhm. Are you sure that you're running hardware-accelerated > > OpenGL glxgears? > > > > I get 48 fps at 1400x1050x32 -- in software, without any > > hardware 3D acceleration. (It's a 1.6GHz Centrino notebook > > with shared i915 graphics. 2D acceleration is enabled, of > > course.) > > glxgears is not a benchmark. That's right. I was not suggesting to use it as a real- world benchmark, but rather as a rough indication whether hardware acceleration is enabled at all or not. If someone gets 1 fps (!) out of glxgears, something is _seriously_ wrong, even with software rendering. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. Passwords are like underwear. You don't share them, you don't hang them on your monitor or under your keyboard, you don't email them, or put them on a web site, and you must change them very often.Received on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 08:43:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC