Re: gcc4

From: Xin LI <delphij_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:16:58 +0800
Hi,

On 12/21/05, Divacky Roman <xdivac02_at_stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:28:48PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
[...]
> > Is our tree gcc4-safe already?  I have not checked for this for a long time...
>
> most of the tree is and the rest is trivial to fix.. havent tried stability
> thought

Not the "whole" :-)

I am not very confident that these "trivial" fixes are correct.  Last
time des@ gave me some input about the concerns of API correctness, as
some "trivial" fixes would just hide serious API mistakes behind
them...

Cheers,
--
Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net
Received on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 16:17:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC