Hi, On 12/21/05, Divacky Roman <xdivac02_at_stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:28:48PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: [...] > > Is our tree gcc4-safe already? I have not checked for this for a long time... > > most of the tree is and the rest is trivial to fix.. havent tried stability > thought Not the "whole" :-) I am not very confident that these "trivial" fixes are correct. Last time des@ gave me some input about the concerns of API correctness, as some "trivial" fixes would just hide serious API mistakes behind them... Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> http://www.delphij.netReceived on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 16:17:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC