Re: td->td_critnest manipulations do not use atomic_add_int ?

From: Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:04:05 -0800
Luigi Rizzo wrote:

>as in the subject... i see that td->td_critnest (used to determine
>whether a thread can be preempted or not) is manipulated using
>plain ++ or -- instruction instead of the atomic_add_int().
>
>I wonder if declaring it as volatile and possibly its
>usage patterns are enough to make the two things equivalent
>on all architectures.
>  
>

is td ever != curthread?

>cheers
>luigi
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>  
>
Received on Tue Dec 20 2005 - 18:04:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC