Re: td->td_critnest manipulations do not use atomic_add_int ?

From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:34:08 +0530

lr> is td ever != curthread?

jhb> No.

I don't think we KASSERT() this in enough places in the code
though.

--
FreeBSD Volunteer,     http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy

Received on Wed Dec 21 2005 - 02:04:11 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Todd: "Bug in latest rev kern_acct.c: panic: Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited"
Previous message: Huang wen hui: "[openoffice]no suitable windowing system found, exiting."
In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: td->td_critnest manipulations do not use atomic_add_int ?"
Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: td->td_critnest manipulations do not use atomic_add_int ?"
Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: td->td_critnest manipulations do not use atomic_add_int ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC