Re: Signature verification failed [OT] (was: Re: vgapci doesn't want to attach agp on ASUS M5A)

From: Max Laier <max_at_love2party.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:52:01 +0100
On Monday 26 December 2005 01:39, Martin P. Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 at 00:55 CET, Max Laier wrote.
>
> I'm not all that used to PGP-signatures. But I can't verify the one
> on Max' message. It is probably some attachment issue, since I can
> verify the signature on the email of Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:34:27 CET.
>
> Am I the only one who can't verify the signature? I just wonder if
> Kmail or Mutt is wrong?

It's the mailing list that insists on rewriting "Content-Type:" - or better, 
does not like the way kmail handles "Content-Type:" ... or at least that's 
what is usually boils down to.  This time the ML just decided to strip off 
one attachment completely (as kmail declared it to be text/x-java for some 
reason out of my understanding).  Here it is as text/plain.

And a diff of the "Content-Type"-rewriting for another mail that was sent to 
freebsd-pf_at_

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier_at_freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier_at_EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

Received on Sun Dec 25 2005 - 23:51:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC