On Dec 28, 2005, at 8:52 PM, David Xu wrote: > Jason Evans wrote: > >> So, how about it? Is jemalloc ready to go in now? >> Thanks, >> Jason > > I have tested super-smack with your patch on my Pentium-D machine: > CPU : P4 dual-core 2.8Ghz > Memory: 1G bytes > I am using libthr. > > phkmalloc can reach about 21000 query-per-s. > jemalloc can only reach about 15000 query-per-s, > about 28% performance is dropped. That is a much different result than Kris Kennaway got on a dual-dual Opteron system, as well as my results on a 3.2 GHz P4. Can you please provide details on what version of the jemalloc patch you used, which MALLOC_OPTIONS flags you used, what parameters you specified to super-smack, etc.? A Pentium-D should behave similarly to two single-core CPUs, right? Thanks, JasonReceived on Thu Dec 29 2005 - 04:00:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:49 UTC