Re: The case for FreeBSD

From: Marian Hettwer <MH_at_kernel32.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:03:00 +0100
Hi there,

supraexpress_at_globaleyes.net wrote:
> WHY all of the moaning and groaning about "lack of exposure" for FreeBSD when
> the Installer is one of the main reasons for this? I know of someone, a
> "general user", who specifically gave up on FreeBSD because of the Installer,
> and jumped over to one of the Linuxes which was "much easier to install". I
> have had to help a couple of others through the Installer because they had
> "gotten lost". This is NOT an excuse for excluding people from discovering or
> using FreeBSD!
>
come on. Be a little bit more real.
Even if we would have a fancy installer (please not as blown up as 
SuSE's or RedHat's), I bet that this Average User couldn't work with 
FreeBSD anyway.
A lot of stuff needs to be configured by hand on FreeBSD. That's the way 
it works now.
If Average Joe can't use sysinstall with www.freebsd.org/handbook/ at 
his hands, he won't be able to use FreeBSD anyway.

Look at the Gentoo Folks, they have a growing userbase and still their 
way of installing is (IMO) harder without documentation than installing 
FreeBSD.

However. Making sysinstall easier ( == fewer options) for newbies might 
be a good idea. If you don't have the handbook you _may_ get lost, due 
to the high amount of options to choose from.

best regards,
Marian
-- 

It takes two to lie.  One to lie and one to listen.

		-- Homer Simpson
		   Colonel Homer
Received on Tue Feb 08 2005 - 14:05:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:27 UTC