Re: panic in recent 6-current

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:28:27 -0800
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:27:54PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:47:11AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:04:19PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
> > > #22 0xc0493087 in softclock (dummy=0x0) at atomic.h:365
> > > #23 0xc04768a3 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc1577480)
> > >     at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546
> > > #24 0xc0475be9 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0476761 <ithread_loop>,
> > >         arg=0xc1577480, frame=0xd3fc3d48) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:790
> > > #25 0xc057ef5c in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:208
> > > 
> > > 
> > > (all other frames are either ??? or from ddb)
> > 
> > Are you running a kernel built with -O2 (bad for gdb) or -O? 
> 
> -Os which is basically -O2, should I test with plain -O ?

Definitely; AIUI -O2 does not maintain good stack trace information.

Kris
Received on Tue Feb 08 2005 - 17:28:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:27 UTC