On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:41:39AM +0100, Martin wrote: > Am Montag, den 07.02.2005, 20:06 -0800 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > Fine, yeah, sysinstall sucks, but writing emails proposing > > specifications for how someone else should implement a replacement > > isn't going to get that job done. Thousands of words have been > > written on that topic over the years, but precious little code. > > I've been trying to port one of my framebuffer-based linux applications, > but I ran into problem with VESA-support on the terminal (inconsistent? > incomplete?) and after even the simpliest VGA-based (320x200) apps > failed to execute leaving me hanging in graphics mode and panic()ing, > I gave up. This was my experience with libvgl last year. > > When I wrote to this list last year, someone suggested to take a look > at KGI4BSD. That's of course nice, but to start programming something, > it would be nice to have the feeling that you have everything you need You should rather rely on GGI (http://www.ggi-project.org) It is very versatile and will allow you to output on vgl(4) or KGI4BSD as you wish. It gives graphic routines and generic framebuffer access. > in the base distribution. And btw, I don't see KGI4BSD supporting VESA > which I would prefer in the first step, because every VGA-card has got VESA is fully supported. It is the most I use here. > this interface and you don't need acceleration when developing simple > applications. KGI4BSD seems to support Matrox- and ATI-only cards > which I don't have here. I'm waiting for KGI4BSD to extend the driver > support and to merge the code into -CURRENT. The people have a good > idea there, but the project is moving slowly. Unfortunatelly, I Indeed the project is slow :( > cannot help with kernel development, because of lack of experience. > It would be nice to see more effort and more developers working at > this project. > > It is a piece of work to write a small widget toolkit and when you > you run into trouble with basic things, it is no fun anymore. GGI is your friend ;) NicholasReceived on Wed Feb 09 2005 - 21:18:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC