Re: newfs limits? 10TB filesystem max?

From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad_at_shire.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:33:08 -0700
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Eric Anderson wrote:

> Brooks Davis wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:49:12PM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
>>> Brooks Davis wrote:
>>> [..snip..]
>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've just built an enormous 10TB filesystem.  When
>>>>>>>>> trying to newfs the disk, it bombed with something
>>>>>>>>> like "cannot allocate memory" after something like
>>>>>>>>> 23xxxxxxxxx sectors..  I noticed disklabel complains
>>>>>>>>> about disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors not being
>>>>>>>>> supported..
>>>
>>> [..snip..]
>>>
>>>> In that case, you probably don't actually have a bsdlabel there.  
>>>> It's
>>>> not longer required with geom since you can newfs disks.
>>>>
>>>> -- Brooks
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok - but I'm still wondering why newfs can't newfs.. Here's the real 
>>> error pasted in:
>>>
>>> a newfs -U /dev/vinum/plex/raid.p0  gives:
>>> ...
>>> 23425543840, 23425920160, 23426296480, 23426672800, 23427049120, 
>>> 23427425440, 23427801760, 23428178080, 23428554400, 23428930720,
>>> 23429307040, 23429683360, 23430059680, 23430436000, 23430812320, 
>>> 23431188640, 23431564960, 23431941280, 23432317600, 23432693920,
>>> 23433070240, 23433446560, 23433822880, 23434199200, 23434575520, 
>>> 23434951840, 23435328160, 23435704480, 23436080800, 23436457120,
>>> 23436833440, 23437209760, 23437586080, 23437962400, 
>>> 23438338720,newfs: wtfs: 65536 bytes at sector 23438715040: Cannot 
>>> allocate memory
>>>
>>> But:
>>> newfs -U -s 23438338720 /dev/vinum/plex/raid.p0 works.. So I'm 
>>> losing the last part of my partition..
>> I'm guessing you are hitting the process datasize limit with newfs.  
>> You
>> should be able to raise it a bit from the default.  Be warned, that 
>> fsck
>> has much higher memory requirements so recovery may be difficult if 
>> not
>> impossiable without a 64-bit machine.
>
> During the newfs, the process only uses 2424K of memory (1825K 
> resident).  I have several hundred MB of memory free the whole time, 
> through and after the newfs.
>
> Eric
>

check the *process limits* is what Brooks was suggesting.  Not the 
system actual resources...
best
Chad
Received on Thu Feb 17 2005 - 20:33:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC