On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > >> This is the output of ntpdate on a 4.11 machine: >> alpha# ntpdate -b time-b.nist.gov > /dev/null >> alpha# > > ntpd 4.1.0 > >> The following is output of ntpdate on a 5.3-stable machine: >> vnode# ntpdate -b time-b.nist.gov > /dev/null >> host found : time-b.nist.gov >> vnode# > > ntpd 4.1.1a > >> The following is the output of ntpdate on a CURRENT machine: >> bling# ntpdate -b time-b.nist.gov > /dev/null >> bling# > > ntpd 4.2.0 + patch to suppress those messages, which was obtained from the > upstream code. > > So the answer is "Because the vendor put it there, and we hid it again in > -CURRENT." Are there any plans to MFC ntpd 4.2.0? If adapting the patch for RELENG_5 (And 4.1.1a) would make the process any easier, could I get my mittens on it? Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >Received on Fri Feb 18 2005 - 12:21:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC