> As the backward compatibility will not be destroyed, > I felt that it would be good having such sed in the base. Yes it will. Code that depends on the PCRE version of SED will not work under non PCRE versions of SED. This is annoying. I've had this bite me from time to time with bash. But at least in the bash case I could install just install bash once I figured out that the stupid shell script was using funky bash features. In the PCRE SED case I would not know what to do since it would come with some particular version of FreeBSD. > But if the default tool can be done better that it is now, why not > do it better? Because the default tool has a defacto standard behavior. Just build a new tool. FreeBSD is not Linux. -- Fred Gilham gilham_at_csl.sri.com The density of a textbook must be inversely proportional to the density of the students using it. --- Dave Stringer-CalvertReceived on Fri Feb 18 2005 - 16:13:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC