Re: ntpdate behavior changes between 4.x, 5.x and CURRENT

From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy_at_siliconlandmark.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:15:02 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Doug White wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
>
>>> ntpd 4.2.0 + patch to suppress those messages, which was obtained from the
>>> upstream code.
>>>
>>> So the answer is "Because the vendor put it there, and we hid it again in
>>> -CURRENT."
>>
>> Are there any plans to MFC ntpd 4.2.0? If adapting the patch for RELENG_5
>> (And 4.1.1a) would make the process any easier, could I get my mittens on
>> it?
>
> Merging is probably not doable due to interface changes in the library,
> but you can certainly figure out how to adapt the patch.  You'll want to
> coordinate with roberto_at_ on any changes since he's done the upstream
> imports.

How about something as simple as the attached patch?

| Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
| Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >
Received on Fri Feb 18 2005 - 20:15:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:28 UTC