On Thursday 06 January 2005 05:36 pm, Stephan Uphoff wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:33, Julian Elischer wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > > >On Wednesday 15 December 2004 05:27 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>Tony Arcieri wrote: > > >>>On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 04:40:50PM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > > >>>>On Wed, Dec 15, 2004, Tony Arcieri wrote: > > >>>>>And am I correct that the UMA implementation in RELENG_5 has > > >>>>> rendered proc_fini() obsolete and thus it won't ever be called? > > >>>> > > >>>>This has very little to do with either UMA or ULE. Yes, it's > > >>>>unused, but it's still there as a reminder that it *ought* to be > > >>>>used. Unless there are still races I don't know about, it's > > >>>>probably safe to start using it again. > > >>> > > >>>Well, I'm going by the comments and implementation from kern_proc.c in > > >>>HEAD: > > >>> > > >>>/* > > >>>* UMA should ensure that this function is never called. > > >>>* Freeing a proc structure would violate type stability. > > >>>*/ > > >>>static void > > >>>proc_fini(void *mem, int size) > > >>>{ > > >>> > > >>> panic("proc reclaimed"); > > >>>} > > >>> > > >>>The implementation in RELENG_5 invokes a scheduler function which is > > >>> no longer present in HEAD. > > >> > > >>when we declare teh zone for processes we tell UMA that it must never > > >> free a proc back to system memory. thus the 'fini' routine, that would > > >> be called is a page of that zone were to be returned to the system, > > >> should never be called. > > > > > >Why are struct procs forced to be type-stable? > > > > I have forgotten.. but they did.. > > Peter also knew at one stage and he too has forgotten :-) > > kern/62890 ? > Guess this one is mine now :-( Hmm. pidp sounds ok to me. Some other users of fork1() use RFSTOPPED and then do a setrunnable() of the first thread after they have finished their localized setup. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Thu Jan 06 2005 - 21:52:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC