On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: +> I'd argue that we might want to replace the int64_t in humanize_number +> with intmax_t since that wouldn't change the ABI (or API due to implicit +> casts), but would mean we wouldn't have to add a humanize_number128 +> later if some architecture grows 128-bit ints for some reason or +> another. I like intmax_t also much better than int64_t, but I took it from NetBSD and they got int64_t there. Anyway, I think we don't have to be 100% compatible here and I'll look what can be done. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd_at_FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC