John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 07 January 2005 05:07 pm, Pawel Worach wrote: > >>Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>>Pawel, can you split out the lines so we can isolate where the panic is >>>occurring? At the end of acpi_pcib.c, before the call to >>>acpi_pci_link_route_interrupt() >> >>Doesn't look like device_get_state() likes this device either. >> >>acpi_MatchHid() Hid: PNP0A03 >>acpi_MatchHid() Hid: PNP0A03 >>pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> on acpi0 >>pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0 >>acpi handle 0xc1ec8d20, name \LPUS >>link device: 0 index 0 > > So it appears the handle doesn't have a device_t associated with it. :( The > next step is to maybe do a printf in the code that adds the device_t's to see > if one shows up for this handle, and if the handle is the same for the given > name. Ok, add this to acpi.c:acpi_add_child(), after AcpiAttachData(): printf("adding child %s, dev %p\n", acpi_name(handle), acpi_get_device(child)); Then send the output. -- NateReceived on Fri Jan 07 2005 - 23:39:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC