Pawel Worach wrote: > Nate Lawson wrote: > >> [...] Change that to "acpi_get_device(handle)" and post the printout, >> just so I can make sure this part is working overall. >> > > Sure. > adding child \_PR_.CPU1, dev 0xc1f7a180 > adding child \_PR_.CPU0, dev 0xc1f16e00 Ok, things are working fine (non-null devices). > adding child \_SB_, dev 0xc1f16b80 This is not really a device and the patch I committed handles this. > --- sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib.c 27 Dec 2004 05:36:47 -0000 1.53 > +++ sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib.c 8 Jan 2005 09:05:57 -0000 > _at__at_ -249,11 +249,18 _at__at_ > /* > * We have to find the source device (PCI interrupt link device). > */ > - if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetHandle(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, prt->Source, > &lnkdev))) { > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetHandle(acpi_get_handle(pcib), prt->Source, > + &lnkdev))) { > device_printf(pcib, "couldn't find PCI interrupt link device %s\n", > prt->Source); > goto out; > } This change should not be committed. I think it's correct to use \ to start the search since your _PRT contains relative references but the links are under \. With the commit I made, you can revert all these patches, including the custom ASL. It should work as before. Let me know if it doesn't. -- NateReceived on Sat Jan 08 2005 - 17:48:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC