0n Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 08:53:11PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > >On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Daniel Eriksson wrote: > >> I'm still having problems with NFS locking up when moving large amounts >> of data over it on 6-CURRENT from 2005.01.11.05.00.00. This problem has >> persisted for a long time now, and the only thing that seems to cure it >> is running the network stack with giant enabled (debug.mpsafenet=0). >> >> When it happens, the process doing the copying ends up in "nfsaio" state >> according to ps. Any accesses to the locked mount by other processes >> ends up waiting forever in state "nfs". I have multiple file systems >> mounted from the same server, and only the mount where the data is being >> moved locks up. The others continue to work as expected. >> >> Server: UP, 6-CURRENT from 2005.01.11.05.00.00, if_vr (POLLING) Client: >> SMP (dual AMD MP), 6-CURRENT from 2005.01.11.05.00.00, if_em >> >> The machines are connected with a crossover cable. I've tried both >> schedulers (4BSD and ULE) on the client, but it doesn't make any >> difference (server is running 4BSD). PREEMPTION is enabled on both >> server and client. ADAPTIVE_GIANT is enabled on the client. > >If you run with INVARIANTS and WITNESS, does anything useful get printed >out? Does it make a difference if you run the client with a UP kernel? > >If you break to the debugger on the client and server once wedging has >occurred, what does "show lockedvnods" and "show alllocks" show? > >Is there any chance you could attach a second NFS client to the >configuration, wedge the file system from the first client, and then try >the second client and see if it experiences immediate problems? What is meant by 'wedge the file system' ? - aWReceived on Fri Jan 14 2005 - 00:15:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC