On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Tim Kientzle wrote: > [Moved to -current for further discussion.] > > David Schultz wrote: > >Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >> > >>>Introduce new field 'fts_bignum' ... > >>>This work is part of the BigDisk project: > >>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/bigdisk/ > >> > >>Any plans to deal with other fts limits ... ? > > > >Removing FTS_LOGICAL's path length limitation is nontrivial, but > >given your experience with bsdtar, I'd say you're an ideal person > >to do it. ;-) > > As it happens, I started tinkering with these ideas a > while ago but haven't found time to finish it all. > > Here's a snapshot of the current WIP: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kientzle/libarchive/src/tree.tgz Nice. That's much cleaner than the fts implementation (although it doesn't do all that fts does.) So tell me again: when did you say were you planning on rewriting/fixing fts? ;-)Received on Fri Jan 14 2005 - 05:48:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC