On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 03:46:31PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > IPIs per second. Instead, I went with a simpler algorithm suggested by phk > that lets me run the timer at hz and guarantees that statclock() will be > called stathz times per second, just not evenly spaced. The same is true I guess this assumes hz > stathz? If that's true and this is committed, you should send a big headsup, as people may still have HZ=100 (I know that's not default, but habits are hard to change). Bye, Andrea -- Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!Received on Sat Jan 15 2005 - 11:20:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC