Re: gratuitous gcc warnings: unused function arguments?

From: Robert Watson <rwatson_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:05:01 +0000 (GMT)
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, David O'Brien wrote:

> We're not going to hack GCC to deal with this.  That is going way too
> far.  This is coming up because people are using high WARNS values in
> Makefiles.  Either back them down to a lower WARNS value; or we should
> add -Wno-unused-parameter to WARNS level 3. 

I'd be fine with simply pushing threshold for unused parameters up a few
notches on the warning scale.  I'd like to have access to the other
interesting warnings are WARNS=3 and WARNS=4 relating to qualifiers,
strings, etc.

Robert N M Watson
Received on Sun Jan 16 2005 - 20:05:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC