On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:15:34AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Is not SUS v3 == "POSIX" 2001 edition (IEEE Std 1003.1-2001)? Yes, with two technical corrigendum, as I read their announce. But Joerg mention older SUSv2 and I mean it too. As I just found, they makes SUSv3 searcheable and browseable in the HTML form. All that needed is just registration at http://www.unix.org/single_unix_specification/ BTW, back to the subj, their text about strtol() is equal to POSIX, so both POSIX and SUSv3 finally agrees. Back yo your question about contradictions, I found explaining quote: "Extension to the ISO C standard The functionality described is an extension to the ISO C standard. Application writers may make use of an extension as it is supported on all IEEE Std 1003.1-2001-conforming systems. With each function or header from the ISO C standard, a statement to the effect that ``any conflict is unintentional'' is included. That is intended to refer to a direct conflict. IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 acts in part as a profile of the ISO C standard, and it may choose to further constrain behaviors allowed to vary by the ISO C standard. Such limitations are not considered conflicts. Where additional semantics apply to a function or header, the material is identified by use of the CX margin legend." -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Fri Jan 21 2005 - 11:58:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC