Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:51:20PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote: > >>Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >>>I got another panic. This time I got a clean core-dump, and I also >>>have a kernel with all the debugging symbols if that would help. >>>Here is some of the info. The system had been up about 18 hours >>>before the panic. The system was basically idle at the time of the >>>panic. This is a snapshot of current which I started to build at >>>about 2pm EST on January 20th. >> >>The duplicate free on failed ATA retry is known. I have a fix here >>locally but it doesnt apply to whats in -current.. >> >>However, -current has severe problems that provokes those timeouts for >>no good reason and in all my cases locks up hard. I just vasted last >>nights sleep hunting for what I thought was a bug in my WIP. I had >>PREEMPTION turned of etc, but it sitll failed in odd ways. >>Going back to Jan 10 00:00 UTC sources make things "just work" with >>PREEMPTION and all. My testbox has now moved around some 800 GB's of >>data with no problems with above backstep, on -current it fails within >>the first few Mbytes.. > > > Are you sure you have an up-to-date kernel? The bug phk fixed last > week might be related. I'm positive, latest tried sources from 2000 CET today. The bug phk fixed was fs related, I'm not convinced this is.. -- -SørenReceived on Fri Jan 21 2005 - 22:03:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:26 UTC