Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?

From: David Malone <dwmalone_at_maths.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:37:37 +0000

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:34:48AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> One of the things I would like to see is for the callout api to gain
> a mutex pointer.

Is something like Ian's patches what you had in mind?

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2004-November/003191.html

	David.

Received on Mon Jan 31 2005 - 08:37:40 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Vladimir Grebenschikov: "Re: do_execve() finding vmspace_destroyed set under load"
Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"
Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:27 UTC