On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote.. > In message: <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d_at_mail.gmail.com> > jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator_at_gmail.com> writes: > : What are the performance implications of a debug kernel? > : > : Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down > : to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for > : sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any > : significant performance hits.. > > So long as it can be turned off, I don't care too much. > > However, I'm going going to take exception that it isn't a disk space Sure.. and we have plenty of Viagra spam to prove it ;-) > starting to fill up. In addition, we sometimes deploy new kernels to > the field and 16MB takes a lot longer to upload than 3MB (think really > bad connectivity to many of the remote locations our systems may be > deployed in). But I assume you would run a customised kernel on these machines anyway? -- Wilko Bulte wilko_at_FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch_at_freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Sat Jul 02 2005 - 23:01:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:38 UTC