On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:59:47PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050705053114.A96381_at_xorpc.icir.org>, Luigi Rizzo writes: > > >Can someone explain why in both 5.x and 6.x, we still have > >"struct buf_queue_head" defined in sys/buf.h ? > > Because things take time :-) ok thanks. Then i have a few hopefully easy questions. (background - this is related to the work my SoC student Emiliano, in Cc, is doing on the disk scheduler) The disk scheduler operates on struct bio_queue_head objects (which include CSCAN scheduler info) and uses 5 methods: bioq_init() initializes the queue. bioq_disksort() to add requests to the queue bioq_first() to peek at the head of the queue bioq_remove() to remove the first element. bioq_flush() right now simply a wrapper around bioq_first() and bioq_remove(), but one could imagine the need for a specific destructor to free memory etc. bioq_insert_head() and bioq_insert_tail() do operate on the same objects; however my impression is that they are used just because they need a TAILQ of struct bio, and bio_queue_head happened to be there - in a perfect world they would be methods of a different class, right ? cheers luigiReceived on Tue Jul 05 2005 - 15:33:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:38 UTC