On Tuesday 05 July 2005 04:47 pm, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Given the error you showed us, I would say you have NO_BIND_MTREE > instead of NO_BIND_ETC in make.conf(5). Correct (after staring at my make.conf rather than trying to recall from memory w/ a lack of caffeine this morning), for the record, here is the entry: -=- # To keep the integrated BIND9 install on 5.x from interfering w/ # servers where we install our own BIND package. We still want the # clients installed (dig, nslookup) but not the server bits (named, # rndc, lwresd) and no chroot. NO_BIND_MTREE=true # Do not run mtree to create chroot directories NO_BIND_NAMED=true # Do not build named, rndc, lwresd, etc. -=- Part of the reason we did this so any upgrades wouldn't clobber any existing named installs in /var/named. > I dare to Cc Doug Barton to have an answer to this, since he is the > author of these bits, IIRC. ack. Thanks. -Peter -- Peter_Losher_at_isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:38 UTC