Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0

On 7/6/05, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie_at_le-hen.org> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> 
> > Of course, the _correct_ way to fix this is for the ports that are now
> > broken by -O2 to be fixed by forcing -O in their makefiles, which
> > really should have been done from the beginning.
> 
> I agree that the correct way to fix ports broken with -O2 is to force
> -O in their makefiles, but this does not say that having something
> like PORTS_CFLAGS would be a bad idea, does it ?
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Jeremie Le Hen

No, not at all: A useful extra feature for those who, for instance,
wish to use increased -O levels for ports.